Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nico-co's avatar

Hi,

I'm indeed here after your charisma essay and I enjoyed this one just as much :)

Synchronicity is a funny thing, I just made a new year resolution to limit screen time to the truly useful activities as I found myself wasting more and more time in the algorithmic black hole and part of that was the strong feeling that something was feeding of my energy by making me repeat the same behavior again and again. Honestly the idea of psychic entities lashing on to you to control your actions does not seem that far fetched when you spend even a moment on the subway with a car full of people swiping endlessly with the same look on their face as all the zombies in a Romero movie...

For a future post, maybe you could make a recommendation for what you would consider a healthy spiritual diet of media or practice? You did mention a few things but I would be curious what left the biggest impression on you personally.

Anyway thank for sharing your thoughts and happy new year, in whatever time zone you happen to be!

Expand full comment
Tawsif Ahmed's avatar

I don’t deny nor reject your claim of mind viruses, demons, and us being programmable.

In one analogy, only being exposed to “good” and not the “bad” is like trying to live like never exposing the immune system to pathogens. It will be catastrophic if/when a serious infection ever comes. And looking at the history of human life and even life in nature, life is rife with suffering and catastrophe.

You might say that analogy is not quite right. That meta and love and clarity is like a 100% force field against the bad or an antibiotic. I’ll even grant you that. Do you think there is no value in the negative states of mind? To me they are potentially like error messages. Getting rid of the error message doesn’t resolve the root issue. One can extract value from “poison”. Look at the botulinum toxin used for Botox or nuclear radiation used for xray.

And even say we can get value and be immune without being exposed to the “demons”. How deep can one’s metta really be if one doesn’t even deep dive to the kind of reality many people live their lives in. It’s easy to be “loving” when you are in heaven’s ivory tower while the poor souls are burning and rotting in the hells below. Repressing my shadow under my consciousness has never turned out well - only worse. The right circumstances will surface it or it will operate under consciousness. I would say a tree can only go as high as its roots go below. And at the final level, I find the “good” and “bad” inseparable. One really has no meaning or existence without the other.

What I can grant is that you need to be exposed to demons. Or that you should. Certainly not. I wouldn’t want to be exposed to certain demons if I couldn’t “survive” or grow from it. Maybe one day I can. And maybe I never will be. And perhaps I don’t need to. And that’s all ok. But to eradicate such demons forever from creative works and just express and promote the “good” so people can be bliss junkies? First that won’t even eradicate the source of the demons inherent in our mind-reality and second, being a bliss junkie is really just a hedonistic or coping strategy. Better than most addictions and the way people live no doubt, but it’s not what I would say is the final destination/way and not even the ideal destination/way, at least for me and folks like me who prefer minimal gap between my model of reality and reality (as impossible of a task to get right and know that one is even right).

Curious about your thoughts on this.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts